Latest Activity

Jax posted a discussion
Tuesday
Jax updated an event

Festive tunes and carols in the Park at Fortune Street Park

December 11, 2024 from 5pm to 7:30pm
Nov 20
Shirley posted events
Nov 18
Maria Elizabeth Prior posted a discussion
Nov 16

Facebook

There are four Golden Lane Estate related facebook accounts and you can follow them here: goldenlaneEC1 

Golden Lane Estate / RCS site 

Save Bernard Morgan House

City of London

Forum

HEALTH & WELLBEING

170 discussions

ESTATE OFFICE ANNOUNCEMENTS

608 discussions

GENERAL COMMENTS & QUERIES

1411 discussions

MAJOR WORKS & PROJECTS

127 discussions

COLPAI

Site of former Richard Cloudesley School

168 discussions

BERNARD MORGAN HOUSE

16 discussions

COMMUNITY CENTRE

21 discussions

ITEMS FOR SALE OR RECYCLE

235 discussions

Following consultation and feedback from residents, changes have been made to the City of London’s Pets Policy.

 

The revised Pets Policy has now been approved by the Housing and Almshouses Management sub-committee.

 

A copy of this policy is attached.

This policy is also available from the estate office.

Regards

Laurence

Views: 1207

Attachments:

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Laurence - but will this policy be applied? We have a couple of residents who parade their dogs around Golden Lane, and have done so for a number of years, claiming that they have some "special arrangement" etc.

Alan, I have had a total of 3 dogs for about 20 years now.  I have mine for psychological medical reasons.  The COL took me to court 20 years ago, for 'breach of tenancy', over this, but I won a court judgement, and was allowed by that court to continue to have my dog.  Any 'special arrangements' would not be because of the COL, but what a court considered fair and reasonable.  

I understand the current new approved policy only permits dogs for those who are physically disabled, and not psychologically disabled, yet under the Equality Act, all disabilities must be treated equally.  Therefore, I am of the opinion that the COL has broken the Equality Law by their stance.  I can assure you I do not 'parade' my dog.  She lives here, with me and my partner, and is well loved by many people.  

Hi Maria, you might be right about the City's policy but if you follow relevant case law from the Equality Act and the DDA you'll find that to be covered in this situation a Senior Clinical Psychiatrist would need to determine that you have a mental illness that leaves you unable to function normally on a day-to-day basis (care for yourself, communicate with others or leave home) and THEN determine that having a dog would be a reasonable adjustment that somehow allows you to limit these disabilities - that's before a Court would even look at your case?
Mental illness is, unfortunately, the Cinderella of our health services.

Yes, I know Alan. I fully understand how it works. That's what happened with me.  I had my GP, psychologist, and several psychiatrists, during my lengthy spell in hospital, followed by the same team out of hospital, including a couple of Senior Psychologists, who diagnosed my illness.  The COL ignored all their advice, and it was only a judge that listened to the medical evidence and ruled in my favour.  

That was 20 years ago, and since then rights of people with disabilities has improved.  The Equality Act clearly states that all disabilities, be they physical or psychological, must be treated equally, when any 'service' is provided.  This is also where the term 'reasonable adjustments' comes into it.  The Equality Commission are clear in that.  That's why I know this policy is unfair.  

RSS

© 2024   Created by GLE Website Comms Team.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service