Say no to the "Burn Calories, Not Electricity" campaign litter

[JM]

Is anyone else dismayed by the plan to litter the estate with "motivational signage" for above campaign?  Don't we have enough visual clutter on the estate without adding more?

I'm also feeling somewhat patronised by the whole tone of this campaign, as if none of us know the benefits of exercise and of energy efficiency.  We don't need hideous, childish, bright green signs everywhere telling us how to live our lives.

Some bright spark decided to run such a campaign where I used to work and it simply 'motivated' people to take the lift as a protest at being nannied.

More cleaning on the estate and less corporation litter please!

[Daniel Elson]

The new sign about parking restrictions that has gone up by Bayer House entrance (which is not accessible to vehicles) would be a good place to start.

[Steve Daszko]

Can`t comment on "MET" parking services, but hopefully, they are an improvement over some of the other cowboys operating!?

[JM]

"Private property".  Hmmm, presumably then those of us who live here (the 'owners' of the property - or at least we who pay for it) can expect to see the revenue from these outrageous level of fines. Oh wait .....

I gave up renting a garage a few years ago to save on outgoings.  I wonder if there is a waiting list for a garage now?

I really don't understand how the Corporation can deface the (listed) estate with impunity when even small blocks of flats can demand that no estate agent for sale signs can be put on flats.  I'm not sure the Corp would get away with this in the Barbican - we are ever the poor relation.

Grumble over.

Daniel Elson said:

The new sign about parking restrictions that has gone up by Bayer House entrance (which is not accessible to vehicles) would be a good place to start.